CRM and ERP are conflated
Sales and customer-service workflows differ from procurement, finance, stock and production. They require distinct buyer-intent groups.
Sales teams select CRM for pipelines and customer interaction, while operations and finance may need ERP for inventory, procurement and resource management. I measure whether AI recommends a product for its actual use cases and check the evidence behind those recommendations.

A product name may appear in AI answers even when its functions and implementation conditions are misrepresented. Buyers need edition-specific evidence.
Sales and customer-service workflows differ from procurement, finance, stock and production. They require distinct buyer-intent groups.
Saying a product integrates with 1C does not establish supported editions, interfaces, sync direction or deployment conditions.
Data migration, training, custom work, integration testing and support can materially change the budget.
Separate platform selection, implementer selection and specific industry requirements while retaining stable query groups for repeat measurements.
| Buyer question | What to verify | GEO task |
|---|---|---|
| Which CRM suits a 20-person sales team? | Pipelines, roles, reporting, telephony, editions and subscription limits | Explain real features and plan constraints |
| Which ERP supports purchasing and inventory across several warehouses? | Modules, master data, stock, permissions and branch processes | Document actual supported workflows |
| Which CRM works with our specific 1C configuration? | Connectors, versions, sync directions, update cadence and assumptions | Integration pages and concrete examples |
| What does migrating from an old ERP cost? | Data volume, cleaning, test cycles, downtime and acceptance | Describe migration scope and estimation factors |
Microsoft's implementation guidance distinguishes configuration from migrated data and includes integration and go-live testing. It offers useful procurement criteria without proving that a named third-party platform implements them.
GAEO's technical B2B research method supports these checks. The MethodLab website-performance case is not presented as a CRM/ERP GEO result.
I start with the concrete jobs buyers need performed, then map missing or inaccurate evidence in sources AI can consult.
Separate CRM, ERP, integration, deployment and industry queries; record BMR and the recommended products.
Review real editions, modules, documentation, licensing and publishable customer references.
Define pages for workflows, integrations, migration, implementation costs and comparisons.
Check BMR, cited sources and factual errors with equivalent prompts and platforms.
Three published monthly plans use the same GAEO prices across sectors. Final scope follows the baseline and project requirements.
I lead the strategy; your team implements website and content specifications.
I study your product, create the content and organize publication.
Contractual BMR targets: baseline +5 / +10 / +15 percentage points in months 1 / 2 / 3.
Start with a free mini-audit or a full GEO audit. A monthly plan includes 50 prompts and 5 AI platforms; broader scope is calculated separately.
Yes when they represent different products or workflows. The relevant buyer roles and selection criteria differ.
Verified versions, a documented connector, data flow and implementation scope. A generic integration badge is not sufficient.
Only for an explicitly specified scope. Complex deployments require a project estimate that covers licences and services.
Only documented project outcomes and details authorised for publication. Do not invent installation counts or time savings.
GAEO's standard audit and monthly pricing applies. Broader prompt, platform and content scope is calculated separately.

Independent GEO/AEO specialist with business experience since 2008. I personally carry out the diagnostic and build an industry-specific plan, separating verified sources from assumptions.
Professional biography ↗Share product editions, integrations, buyer industries and your official site. I will propose a suitable baseline.
Discuss an initial audit