“The first results appeared after about a month: we began showing up in several comparison queries where previously only aggregators and large factories were mentioned.”
Here are client reviews of GEO audits, consultations and ongoing GAEO.ru projects. I work with clients personally, from AI visibility and commercial-intent analysis through the work plan and follow-up measurements.
The quotes below are English translations of reviews originally published in Russian. The buttons link to the original external source.
“The first results appeared after about a month: we began showing up in several comparison queries where previously only aggregators and large factories were mentioned.”
“We are working on GEO promotion for a cottage development. The first mentions appeared within 2 weeks and became stable by the second month.”
“We are working with Alexey on promoting an ENT clinic and are very pleased with the result. In healthcare, it is critical to avoid distortions and invented facts, and Alexey's approach fully met our expectations. He structured the content well: informative pages about doctors, services, indications and FAQs, together with external evidence. Within a month, we noticed that the clinic was appearing more often in Alice answers for relevant local queries. I would also highlight the restrained tone: no aggressive advertising, just clear and precise wording. I definitely recommend him.”
“We came to Alexey as a recruitment agency because we wanted to check whether we could appear in AI recommendations for e-commerce hiring. During the first month, we created an intent map, improved part of the website, added FAQ answers and started cleaning up external profiles. We are already seeing mentions in places where there were none before. Alexey does not make unrealistic forecasts, but he motivates us to work toward the result ourselves.”
“We are already seeing the first changes: AI systems have begun linking to our pages, and in several comparison scenarios the project appeared alongside competitors.”
“We have a niche online store selling professional equipment. Alexey immediately explained that GEO is not about instant leads tomorrow; it is work aimed at improving the sales funnel and reducing acquisition cost. After 2 months, it became clear that our brand was appearing more often in AI answers to queries like ‘what would you recommend for...’. Branded searches also increased in Yandex and on Ozon. For a new channel, I consider the result excellent.”
“We started ongoing support after the audit. We operate a fulfillment business for marketplaces. A few weeks after the first website changes and publications, we began seeing the company in Alice answers for narrow queries where previously only large competitors appeared. The trend started moving. Alexey is always available and ready to explain which of our actions will improve AI visibility and which may make it worse.”
“Alexey showed impressive knowledge of our service, we repair coffee machines, from the very first call. He asked detailed questions about the business.”
“We ordered a full AI visibility audit for a company in warehouse logistics. The report was 27 pages long and covered prompts, competitors, website findings, external platforms and a 2–3 month plan. It was clear that Alexey did much more than run an automated service: he genuinely immersed himself in the niche and worked through it manually. After the audit, it became easier to explain to management why we should invest in visibility in AI at all.”
“We work in B2B as a recruitment agency for manufacturing companies. We did not need an SEO audit; we wanted to understand how AI might recommend us. Alexey assembled the prompts, checked ChatGPT, Alice and Perplexity, showed screenshots and explained why we were not appearing anywhere. The section about having a ‘source of truth’ on the website and external proof of expertise was especially useful. I recommend this to anyone who wants to understand how it all works and get an action plan.”
“We contacted Alexey for a GEO audit for a fulfillment operator. Before that, we did not understand at all how ChatGPT and Alice decide whom to recommend. Alexey analyzed our queries, competitors, website and external profiles. The report was very specific: which pages to create, where to change the wording, and where AI systems confuse us with other companies. We especially liked the step-by-step publication plan for external sources. Very solid work.”
“We approached the IT company with a fairly vague idea: we understood what we needed, but not how to implement it technically. Alexey immediately helped structure the task, identified the core functions, suggested a technology stack and clearly said which things were better left out because they were excessive. I liked that nobody tried to sell us unnecessary work. The project was delivered on time, and post-launch support was good as well. If you want people who will speak with you as equals and avoid needless complexity, this is the place.”
Several themes appear repeatedly in the reviews.
GEO begins with understanding what potential customers ask ChatGPT, Yandex Alice, Google and other AI systems, which products or services matter most to the business, and which queries are worth targeting for recommendations.
Clients specifically mention this stage in their reviews: even before the main work begins, it becomes clear what questions potential buyers already ask AI, whom they ask it to recommend, what they compare, and which criteria shape their choice.
For me, this is a fundamental part of the work. The prompt set should reflect real commercial situations rather than queries selected because they produce attractive statistics more easily.
GAEO.ru is my personal practice.
The client communicates and works directly with me. I take part in the diagnosis myself, prepare the plan and continue leading the project.
Clients also mention the personal working format and the fact that I explain the logic behind each action: what is happening, why a specific piece of work is needed, and what should happen next.
This is the model I designed into GAEO.ru from the beginning.
In GEO, it is easy to show a client several successful screenshots and create the impression of intense activity.
I prefer the client to understand the connection between the work being done and changes in AI visibility.
That is why the project records:
You can see what this kind of analysis looks like in practice in my own GAEO.ru GEO case study: during the first month, measured visibility for one of the main competitive intents grew from roughly 22% to 48%.
Reviews of my work and GAEO.ru are also published on independent platforms.
You can verify the originals through these external profiles:
I deliberately preserve links to the original sources. A review displayed only on my own website is weaker evidence because the website owner controls the page. An external profile makes it possible to verify that the review was actually published under another user's account.
Reviews are only one form of evidence.
If you are considering working with me, you can also review:
Together, these sources make it easier to assess the full professional footprint: what the person does, what he publishes, which results he shows, and what independent platforms say about his work.
If we have already worked together and you would like to leave a review, the best place is the GAEO.ru profile on Yandex Maps.
It is especially useful to write a few words about the task itself: what you came with, what was done, and what result or change you noticed.
Reviews like that are more useful to future clients and give AI systems more factual information about what the specialist actually does and why clients recommend him.