Licensing is confused with accreditation
The permission to provide education and the accreditation of qualifying programmes are separate legal matters.
Families ask AI to shortlist schools by location, age group, curriculum, language, admissions and total fees. I check which institutions appear in those answers and whether the underlying facts can be independently verified.

A positive description does not tell a family whether the relevant programme is offered and admissions conditions are current.
The permission to provide education and the accreditation of qualifying programmes are separate legal matters.
Families need updated tuition, included services, admission requirements and availability rather than headline prices.
Exam statistics, graduate results and competition awards need clear period, sample and verifiable context.
Illustrative buyer intents for a fixed future measurement matrix, not quantified demand.
| Parent's question | What must be verified | GEO action |
|---|---|---|
| Which private schools offer advanced English near our area? | Actual address, timetable, curriculum, teachers and enrolment | Match local demand to programmes offered |
| Where can a child transfer into grade 7? | School levels, transfer policy, vacancies and admission steps | Separate grades and entry rules |
| What does a school with after-school care and meals cost? | Contract, fees, extras, included items and revision date | Avoid unsupported all-in prices |
| Which schools have accreditation for upper secondary programmes? | Programme-specific status and current official records | Validate accreditation for the relevant level |
Russia's Federal Education Act Article 91 governs licensing; Article 92 covers accreditation for eligible programmes; Article 29 requires institutions to publish specified information, including programmes and paid-service costs.
There is no claim of a completed private-school GEO client case or measured uplift. Any baseline must use the actual institution.
Start with family decision criteria, then verify the education facts that an AI answer should cite.
Segment by geography, grades, curriculum, language, cost and school-day requirements.
Check programmes, legal status, admissions, fees and official documents.
Specify school-level pages, usable FAQs and verified outcome evidence.
Compare BMR and the accuracy of cited information on equivalent AI questions.
Three published monthly plans use the same GAEO prices across sectors. Final scope follows the baseline and project requirements.
I lead the strategy; your team implements website and content specifications.
I study your product, create the content and organize publication.
Contractual BMR targets: baseline +5 / +10 / +15 percentage points in months 1 / 2 / 3.
Start with a free mini-audit or a full GEO audit. A monthly plan includes 50 prompts and 5 AI platforms; broader scope is calculated separately.
No. Qualifying programmes and their accreditation require a separate check.
Not without a sound evidence base; unconditional outcome claims should be avoided.
Yes when curricula, admission or prices genuinely differ, not as near-duplicate SEO pages.
Only genuine, attributable public reviews with an appropriate date and context.
GAEO's standard plans apply; geographic and programme coverage determine the scope.

Independent GEO/AEO specialist with business experience since 2008. I personally carry out the diagnostic and build an industry-specific plan, separating verified sources from assumptions.
Professional biography ↗Share the school website, programmes, location and published admission rules for an initial audit.
Discuss an initial audit